z-logo
Premium
The diagnostic value of MRI for persistent prostate cancer following irreversible electroporation focal therapy
Author(s) -
Zhang Kai,
Teoh Jeremy,
Laguna Pilar,
DominguezEscrig Jose,
Barret Eric,
RamonBorja Juan Casanova,
Muir Gordon,
Bohr Julia,
Gomez Paula Pelechano,
Reijke Theo M.,
Ng ChiFai,
Leung ChiHo,
SanchezSalas Rafael,
Rosette Jean
Publication year - 2025
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/bju.16720
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for persistent prostate cancer after irreversible electroporation (IRE) therapy. Patients and Methods This is a post hoc analysis from a multicentre randomised trial, in which men with localised low‐ to intermediate‐risk prostate cancer were randomised to receive either focal or extended IRE ablation. All patients underwent repeat MRI scans at 6 and 12 months and transperineal template mapping biopsy (TMB) at 6 months post‐IRE. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI were calculated for infield and outfield lesions using 2 × 2 contingency tables with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for clinically significant prostate cancer and any‐grade prostate cancer. Results A total of 106 patients were recruited to this study, including 39 patients (37%) with clinically insignificant prostate cancer and 67 patients (63%) with clinically significant prostate cancer (International Society of Urological Pathology grade ≥2). Of these, 101 patients underwent repeat MRI scan and prostate biopsy at 6 months after IRE. The rate of clinically significant prostate cancer detected by TMB infield and outfield was 9.9% (10/101) and 9.9% (10/101), respectively. In the treated area, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for MRI to detect clinically significant prostate cancer were 30% (95% CI 6.7%–65%), 91% (95% CI 82%–96%), 27% (95% CI 6.0%–61%) and 92% (95% CI 84%–97%), respectively. In the untreated area, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of MRI to detect clinically significant prostate cancer were 20% (95% CI 2.5%–56%), 91% (95% CI 82%–96%), 20% (95% CI 2.5%–56%) and 91% (95% CI 82%–96%), respectively. Conclusion Favourable specificity but poor sensitivity was achieved with use of MRI to detect persistent clinically significant prostate cancer after IRE treatment. Repeat TMB should not be deferred, regardless of MRI results.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Empowering knowledge with every search

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom