z-logo
Premium
Use of bulbospongiosus muscle for repair of traumatic posterior urethral stenosis combined with urethrorectal fistulas
Author(s) -
Hou Changhao,
Huang Jianwen,
Zhu Weidong,
Zhang Kaile,
Cao Nailong,
Liang Tao,
Song Guoping,
Zhang Jiong,
Fu Qiang,
Song Lujie
Publication year - 2025
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/bju.16709
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and functional outcomes of bulbospongiosus muscle (BSM) flap interposition in the repair of urethral stenosis combined with urethrorectal fistula (USURF) or anterior rectal wall weakness (USRW). Patients and Methods Between January 2016 and December 2023, 36 patients underwent transperineal posterior urethroplasty with BSM flap interposition. 36 patients with traumatic posterior urethral stenosis who underwent perineal urethroplasty without interposition of the BSM as the control group, matched by propensity score analysis during the same period. Pre‐ and intra‐operative clinical data were collected. Functional outcomes, including voiding, erectile, and ejaculatory function, were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 36 males were included, of whom 19 (52.8%) had USURF and 17 (47.2%) had USRW. The mean follow‐up time was 31.3 ± 17.7 months. The overall success rate was 94.4%. The median operating time was 3.0 (2.0, 3.0) h. The mean stricture length was 4.2 ± 1.2 cm. The mean postoperative maximum urinary flow rate was 24.2 ± 12.9 mL/s. Postoperative functional outcomes did not significantly differ between BSM interposition and BSM non‐interposition group as assessed by Incontinence Questionnaire Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (5.0 vs 3.0; P  = 0.399), the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (3.0 vs 6.5; P  = 0.183), Erection Hardness Score ( P  = 0.801), the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire 4 (1.0 vs 1.0; P  = 1.00), European Quality of Life‐5 Dimensions (0.9 ± 0.1 vs 0.9 ± 0.1; P  = 0.139), EQ‐VAS scores (75.9 ± 20.0 vs 79.9 ± 18.7; P  = 0.428), urine dribbling (2.0 vs 1.5, P  = 0.727), ejaculation volume (2.0 vs 2.0, P  = 0.631) and ejaculation intensity (3.0 vs 4.0, P  = 0.645). Conclusions Transperineal BSM flap interposition combined with anastomosis urethroplasty and urethrorectal fistula repair is a safe and effective treatment. BSM can strengthen the anterior rectal wall and separate the urethral anastomosis from the repaired rectal fistula, which should improve the success rate of fistula repair.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Empowering knowledge with every search

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom