Premium
Prey ration, temperature, and predator species influence digestion rates of prey DNA inferred from qPCR and metabarcoding
Author(s) -
Dick Cory,
Larson Wesley A.,
Karpan Kirby,
Baetscher Diana S.,
Shi Yue,
Sethi Suresh,
Fangue Nann A.,
Henderson Mark J.
Publication year - 2025
Publication title -
molecular ecology resources
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.96
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1755-0998
pISSN - 1755-098X
DOI - 10.1111/1755-0998.13849
Subject(s) - biology , predation , predator , ictalurus , micropterus , trophic level , digestion (alchemy) , catfish , zoology , oncorhynchus , prey detection , ecology , bass (fish) , fishery , fish <actinopterygii> , chemistry , chromatography
Abstract Diet analysis is a vital tool for understanding trophic interactions and is frequently used to inform conservation and management. Molecular approaches can identify diet items that are impossible to distinguish using more traditional visual‐based methods. Yet, our understanding of how different variables, such as predator species or prey ration size, influence molecular diet analysis is still incomplete. Here, we conducted a large feeding trial to assess the impact that ration size, predator species, and temperature had on digestion rates estimated with visual identification, qPCR, and metabarcoding. Our trial was conducted by feeding two rations of Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) to two piscivorous fish species (largemouth bass [ Micropterus salmoides ] and channel catfish [ Ictalurus punctatus ]) held at two different temperatures (15.5 and 18.5°C) and sacrificed at regular intervals up to 120 h from the time of ingestion to quantify the prey contents remaining in the digestive tract. We found that ration size, temperature, and predator species all influenced digestion rate, with some indication that ration size had the largest influence. DNA‐based analyses were able to identify salmon smolt prey in predator gut samples for much longer than visual analysis (~12 h for visual analysis vs. ~72 h for molecular analyses). Our study provides evidence that modelling the persistence of prey DNA in predator guts for molecular diet analyses may be feasible using a small set of controlling variables for many fish systems.