Premium
Structural comparisons of TIM barrel proteins suggest functional and evolutionary relationships between β‐galactosidase and other glycohydrolases
Author(s) -
Juers Douglas H.,
Huber Reuben E.,
Matthews Brian W.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
protein science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.353
H-Index - 175
eISSN - 1469-896X
pISSN - 0961-8368
DOI - 10.1110/ps.8.1.122
Subject(s) - homotetramer , biology , escherichia coli , protein subunit , glycoside hydrolase , protein structure , biochemistry , barrel (horology) , enzyme , gene , materials science , composite material
Abstract β‐Galactosidase (lacZ) from Escherichia coli is a 464 kDa homotetramer. Each subunit consists of five domains, the third being an α/β barrel that contains most of the active site residues. A comparison is made between each of the domains and a large set of proteins representative of all structures from the protein data bank. Many structures include an α/β barrel. Those that are most similar to the α/β barrel of E. coli β‐galactosidase have similar catalytic residues and belong to the so‐called “4/7 superfamily” of glycosyl hydrolases. The structure comparison suggests that β‐amylase should also be included in this family. Of three structure comparison methods tested, the “ProSup” procedure of Zu‐Kang and Sippl and the “Superimpose” procedure of Diederichs were slightly superior in discriminating the members of this superfamily, although all procedures were very powerful in identifying related protein structures. Domains 1, 2, and 4 of E. coli β‐galactosidase have topologies related to “jelly‐roll barrels” and “immunoglobulin constant” domains. This fold also occurs in the cellulose binding domains (CBDs) of a number of glycosyl hydrolases. The fold of domain 1 of E. coli β‐galactosidase is closely related to some CBDs, and the domain contributes to substrate binding, but in a manner unrelated to cellulose binding by the CBDs. This is typical of domains 1, 2, 4, and 5, which appear to have been recruited to play roles in β‐galactosidase that are unrelated to the functions that such domains provide in other contexts. It is proposed that β‐galactosidase arose from a prototypical single domain α/β barrel with an extended active site cleft. The subsequent incorporation of elements from other domains could then have reduced the size of the active site from a cleft to a pocket to better hydrolyze the disaccharide lactose and, at the same time, to facilitate the production of inducer, allolactose.