Premium
Critical assessment of quantum mechanics based energy restraints in protein crystal structure refinement
Author(s) -
Yu Ning,
Li Xue,
Cui Guanglei,
Hayik Seth A.,
Merz Kenneth M.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
protein science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.353
H-Index - 175
eISSN - 1469-896X
pISSN - 0961-8368
DOI - 10.1110/ps.062343206
Subject(s) - physics , molecular mechanics , quantum mechanics , classical mechanics , theoretical physics , statistical physics , molecular dynamics
A critical evaluation of the performance of X‐ray refinement protocols using various energy functions is presented using the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI) protein. The four potential energy functions we explored include: (1) fully quantum mechanical calculations; (2) one based on an incomplete molecular mechanics (MM) energy function employed in the Crystallography and NMR System (CNS) with empirical parameters developed by Engh and Huber (EH), which lacks electrostatic and attractive van der Waals terms; (3) one based on a complete MM energy function (AMBER ff99 parameter set); and (4) the same as 3, with the addition of a Generalized Born (GB) implicit solvation term. The R , R free , real space R values of the refined structures and deviations from the original experimental structure were used to assess the relative performance. It was found that at 1 Å resolution the physically based energy functions 1, 3, and 4 performed better than energy function 2, which we attribute to the better representation of key interactions, particularly electrostatics. The observed departures from the experimental structure were similar for the refinements with physically based energy functions and were smaller than the structure refined with EH. A test refinement was also performed with the reflections truncated at a high‐resolution cutoff of 2.5 Å and with random perturbations introduced into the initial coordinates, which showed that low‐resolution refinements with physically based energy functions held the structure closer to the experimental structure solved at 1 Å resolution than the EH‐based refinements.