z-logo
Premium
Secondary structure determines protein topology
Author(s) -
Fleming Patrick J.,
Gong Haipeng,
Rose George D.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
protein science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.353
H-Index - 175
eISSN - 1469-896X
pISSN - 0961-8368
DOI - 10.1110/ps.062305106
Subject(s) - topology (electrical circuits) , physics , protein folding , protein structure , protein secondary structure , mathematics , combinatorics , nuclear magnetic resonance
Abstract Using a test set of 13 small, compact proteins, we demonstrate that a remarkably simple protocol can capture native topology from secondary structure information alone, in the absence of long‐range interactions. It has been a long‐standing open question whether such information is sufficient to determine a protein's fold. Indeed, even the far simpler problem of reconstructing the three‐dimensional structure of a protein from its exact backbone torsion angles has remained a difficult challenge owing to the small, but cumulative, deviations from ideality in backbone planarity, which, if ignored, cause large errors in structure. As a familiar example, a small change in an elbow angle causes a large displacement at the end of your arm; the longer the arm, the larger the displacement. Here, correct secondary structure assignments (α‐helix, β‐strand, β‐turn, polyproline II, coil) were used to constrain polypeptide backbone chains devoid of side chains, and the most stable folded conformations were determined, using Monte Carlo simulation. Just three terms were used to assess stability: molecular compaction, steric exclusion, and hydrogen bonding. For nine of the 13 proteins, this protocol restricts the main chain to a surprisingly small number of energetically favorable topologies, with the native one prominent among them.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here