z-logo
Premium
Redesigning symmetry‐related “mini‐core” regions of FGF‐1 to increase primary structure symmetry: Thermodynamic and functional consequences of structural symmetry
Author(s) -
Dubey Vikash Kumar,
Lee Jihun,
Blaber Michael
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
protein science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.353
H-Index - 175
eISSN - 1469-896X
pISSN - 0961-8368
DOI - 10.1110/ps.051494405
Subject(s) - side chain , symmetry (geometry) , protein structure , asymmetry , crystallography , chemistry , mutant , stereochemistry , physics , geometry , biochemistry , mathematics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , gene , polymer
Previous reports detailing mutational effects within the hydrophobic core of human acidic fibroblast growth factor (FGF‐1) have shown that a symmetric primary structure constraint is compatible with a stably folded protein. In the present report, we investigate symmetrically related pairs of buried hydrophobic residues in FGF‐1 (termed “mini‐cores”) that are not part of the central core. The effect upon the stability and function of FGF‐1 mutations designed to increase primary structure symmetry within these “mini‐core” regions was evaluated. At symmetry‐related positions 22, 64, and 108, the wild‐type protein contains either Tyr or Phe side chains. The results show that either residue can be readily accommodated at these positions. At symmetry‐related positions 42, 83, and 130, the wild‐type protein contains either Cys or Ile side chains. While positions 42 and 130 can readily accommodate either Cys or Ile side chains, position 83 is substantially destabilized by substitution by Ile. Tertiary structure asymmetry in the vicinity of position 83 appears responsible for the inability to accommodate an Ile side chain at this position, and is known to contribute to functional half‐life. A mutant form of FGF‐1 with enforced primary structure symmetry at positions 22, 64, and 108 (all Tyr) and 42, 83, and 130 (all Cys) is shown to be more stable than the reference FGF‐1 protein. The results support the hypothesis that a symmetric primary structure within a symmetric protein superfold represents a solution to achieving a foldable, stable polypeptide, and highlight the role that function may play in the evolution of asymmetry within symmetric superfolds.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here