Premium
Deamidation: Differentiation of aspartyl from isoaspartyl products in peptides by electron capture dissociation
Author(s) -
Cournoyer Jason J.,
Pittman Jason L.,
Ivleva Vera B.,
Fallows Eric,
Waskell Lucy,
Costello Catherine E.,
O'Connor Peter B.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
protein science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.353
H-Index - 175
eISSN - 1469-896X
pISSN - 0961-8368
DOI - 10.1110/ps.041062905
Subject(s) - deamidation , chemistry , aspartic acid , succinimide , electron capture dissociation , peptide , side chain , residue (chemistry) , stereochemistry , amino acid , mass spectrometry , fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance , biochemistry , organic chemistry , enzyme , chromatography , polymer
Deamidation of asparaginyl and isomerization of aspartyl residues in proteins proceed through a succinimide intermediate producing a mixture of aspartyl and isoaspartyl residues. Isoaspartic acid is an isomer of aspartic acid with the C β incorporated into the backbone, thus increasing the length of the protein backbone by one methylene unit. This post‐translation modification is suspected to contribute to the aging of proteins and to protein folding disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, so that differentiating the two isomers becomes important. This manuscript reports that distinguishing aspartyl from isoaspartyl residues in peptides has been accomplished by electron capture dissociation (ECD) using a Fourier transform mass spectrometer (FTMS). Model peptides with aspartyl residues and their isoaspartyl analogs were examined and unique peaks corresponding to c n •+58 and z ℓ−n ‐57 fragment ions (n, position of Asp; ℓ, total number of amino acids in the peptide) were found only in the spectra of the peptides with isoaspartyl residues. The proposed fragmentation mechanism involves cleavage of the C α —C β backbone bond, therefore splitting the isoaspartyl residue between the two fragments. Also, a complementary feature observed specific to aspartyl residues was the neutral loss of the aspartic acid side chain from the charge reduced species. CAD spectra of the peptides from the same instrument demonstrated the improved method because previously published CAD methods rely on the comparison to the spectra of standards with aspartyl residues. The potential use of the top‐down approach to detect and resolve products from the deamidation of asparaginyl and isomerization of aspartyl residues is discussed.