
Fusion-Based Additive Manufacturing of Hastelloy C-Series: A Comparative Study on Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, and Residual Stress
Author(s) -
M. D. Barath Kumar,
R. Madesh,
M. Sathishkumar,
D. Sakthimurugan,
Keerthipalli Trinath,
S. Sathiyamurthy,
V. Praveen Kumar,
M. Vignesh
Publication year - 2025
Publication title -
ieee access
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Magazines
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 2169-3536
DOI - 10.1109/access.2025.3598731
Subject(s) - aerospace , bioengineering , communication, networking and broadcast technologies , components, circuits, devices and systems , computing and processing , engineered materials, dielectrics and plasmas , engineering profession , fields, waves and electromagnetics , general topics for engineers , geoscience , nuclear engineering , photonics and electrooptics , power, energy and industry applications , robotics and control systems , signal processing and analysis , transportation
The fusion-based single pulsed gas metal arc welding (SP-GMAW) additive manufacturing (AM) process has attracted considerable attention because of its high production efficiency, elevated deposition rates, and near-net-shape capabilities. The present study presents a comparative investigation of Hastelloy C-276 and Hastelloy C-22 thin-walled components fabricated using a SP-GMAW based AM process. This study thoroughly investigates the microstructure, material properties, and residual stress of the components. The microstructures in various regions comprise dendrite structure in Hastelloy C-276 and C-22 superalloys. The Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) analysis revealed a discrepancy in elemental composition between C-276 and C-22 materials. Additionally, the average grain size in the top, middle, and bottom portions of C-22 are 67.8 μm, 78.6 μm, and 87.6 μm while C-276 has 72.5 μm, 80.2 μm, and 96.8 μm, respectively. Compared to the build direction, the travel direction has a higher mean microhardness. Hastelloy C-22 achieves a maximum hardness of 320 HV, while Hastelloy C-276 has a hardness of 286 HV. The highest recorded tensile strength for Hastelloy C-22 was 772 ±5.1MPa, whereas Hastelloy C-276 displayed a tensile strength of 758±4.1MPa in the upper regions along the travel direction. According to the stress distribution, the as-fabricated specimens of Hastelloy C-276 and C-22 are mostly impacted by tensile residual stress. Research on Hastelloy C series alloy comparisons and single pulsed GMAW-basedWAAM technologies is limited and progressing. The comparative results of this research will be significant in the chemical-based, nuclear energy, maritime, and manufacturing industries.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom