z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Time-Domain Versus Frequency-Embedded EEG Sequences for Sensorimotor BCI Using 1D−CNN
Author(s) -
Simanto Saha,
Mathias Baumert,
Alistair McEwan
Publication year - 2025
Publication title -
ieee access
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Magazines
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 2169-3536
DOI - 10.1109/access.2025.3595953
Subject(s) - aerospace , bioengineering , communication, networking and broadcast technologies , components, circuits, devices and systems , computing and processing , engineered materials, dielectrics and plasmas , engineering profession , fields, waves and electromagnetics , general topics for engineers , geoscience , nuclear engineering , photonics and electrooptics , power, energy and industry applications , robotics and control systems , signal processing and analysis , transportation
This study proposed a motor imagery (MI) classification pipeline featuring a 1−dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) with different time/frequency feature representation techniques. The objective was to classify right hand (RH) versus right foot (RF) MI tasks in both intra- and inter-subject (pairwise and pooled) BCI settings using a 1D-CNN architecture trained on time-domain bandpass filtered electroencephalography (EEG) signals, frequency-embedded power spectral density (PSD) and cross-power spectral density (CPSD) sequences. The EEG signals were bandpass filtered with 4 Hz and 32 Hz cut-off frequencies, and PSD/CPSD sequences were estimated in the same frequency range. Thus, the number of input channels for 1D-CNN was N , N or N × N for EEG signals, PSD or CPSD sequences. We used dataset IVa from BCI Competition III in 5−fold cross-validation settings to evaluate intra-subject, inter-subject (pairwise) and inter-subject (pooled) BCI classification accuracies. We compared the performance of the proposed methods with classification algorithms featuring common spatial patterns (CSP) for benchmarking. The best overall classification accuracies (%) for intra-subject, inter-subject (pairwise) and inter-subject (pooled) BCIs were 86.57±11.69, 70.80±9.21 and 76.61±12.37 using 1D−CNN with time-domain EEG signals. The average classification accuracies using 1D-CNN with frequency-embedded PSD sequences were 82.57±10.20, 69.32±7.46 and 71.32±7.96 for intra-subject, inter-subject (pairwise) and inter-subject (pooled) BCIs. The proposed time/frequency feature representation techniques with 1D-CNN outperformed CSP-based algorithms (p-value < 0.05). The comparative results suggest the utility of the proposed methods for MI classification, especially for a fully zero-training inter-subject BCI.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom