z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Error performance of DDPSK receiver in the presence of composite fading
Author(s) -
Goran T. Djordjevic,
Milica Petkovic,
Nenad Milosevic,
Bane Vasic
Publication year - 2025
Publication title -
ieee access
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Magazines
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 2169-3536
DOI - 10.1109/access.2025.3576058
Subject(s) - aerospace , bioengineering , communication, networking and broadcast technologies , components, circuits, devices and systems , computing and processing , engineered materials, dielectrics and plasmas , engineering profession , fields, waves and electromagnetics , general topics for engineers , geoscience , nuclear engineering , photonics and electrooptics , power, energy and industry applications , robotics and control systems , signal processing and analysis , transportation
We investigate the justification for implementing double differential phase-shift keying (DDPSK) instead of differential phase-shift keying (DPSK) in the presence of carrier frequency offset (CFO) over wireless channels affected by thermal noise, multipath fading, and shadowing. When shadowed multipath fading is modeled using the Fisher-Snedecor F distribution, we present the probability density function (PDF) of the received composite signal phase in the form of the Fourier series and derive novel analytical expressions for its Fourier coefficients. Furthermore, we present analytical expressions for the symbol error probability (SEP) in detection of DDPSK and DPSK signals over such shadowed fading channels. These expressions are derived in the form of infinite series followed by the appropriate proof of convergence. We determine the necessary number of terms to achieve a given accuracy. Derived expressions allow us to illustrate the superiority of DDPSK compared to DPSK in the presence of CFO. We analyze the applicability of DDPSK across various values of normalized CFO, multipath fading depth, and shadowing severity, considering different modulation orders. Our key conclusion is that DDPSK outperforms DPSK when CFO values are higher. Additionally, as the modulation order increases, CFO has a stronger impact on SEP degradation in DPSK detection. Notably, at higher CFO values, DDPSK superiority becomes evident even at lower signal-to-noise ratio levels.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom