z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Black Hole Algorithm for Software Requirements Prioritization
Author(s) -
Norah Ibrahim Alfassam,
M. Abdullah-Al-Wadud,
Mubarak Rashed Alrashoud
Publication year - 2025
Publication title -
ieee access
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Magazines
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 2169-3536
DOI - 10.1109/access.2025.3574998
Subject(s) - aerospace , bioengineering , communication, networking and broadcast technologies , components, circuits, devices and systems , computing and processing , engineered materials, dielectrics and plasmas , engineering profession , fields, waves and electromagnetics , general topics for engineers , geoscience , nuclear engineering , photonics and electrooptics , power, energy and industry applications , robotics and control systems , signal processing and analysis , transportation
With the increase in complexity in the software development process, the optimization of requirements management has developed into a critical and necessary task in Software Engineering. The selection and prioritization of software requirements is one of the most commonly encountered issues among the many requirements for software release. Software engineers have introduced several methods for solving these problems. The Black Hole Algorithm (BHA) is a population-based approach. It is among one of the many modern approaches and has been successfully applied to solve optimization problems. The purpose of this study is to provide a BHA-based solution to the Requirements Prioritization (RP) problem. Furthermore, the proposed BHA-based solution was evaluated on three real-world datasets (RALIC, Word, and ReleasePlanner), and its performance was compared with that of multiple state-of-the-art algorithms, including Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The findings show that BHA consistently yielded higher fitness values, reaching 98.37% for Word, 98.82% for ReleasePlanner, and 99.67% for RALIC. In contrast, the highest percentages achieved by PSO were 95.01%, 90.53%, and 94.37%, respectively, while ACO, GA, and GWO also remained behind BHA in all three datasets. Thus, BHA outperforms competing techniques and provides a better solution to the problem of software requirements prioritization.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Empowering knowledge with every search

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom