
The economic market outcomes and income distribution when capital is not homogeneous
Author(s) -
Ahmet Özçam
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of industry-university collaboration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2631-357X
DOI - 10.1108/jiuc-03-2019-004
Subject(s) - economics , capital (architecture) , physical capital , homogeneous , production (economics) , production function , constant elasticity of substitution , originality , fixed capital , elasticity of substitution , microeconomics , econometrics , labour economics , capital formation , financial capital , human capital , market economy , profit (economics) , physics , thermodynamics , archaeology , creativity , political science , law , history
Purpose An aggregate production function has been used in macroeconomic analysis for a long time, even though it seems that it is conceptually confusing and problematic. The purpose of this paper is to argue that the measurement problem related to the heterogenous capital input that exists in macroeconomics is also relevant to microeconomic market situations. Design/methodology/approach The author constructed a microeconomic market model to address both the problems of the measurement of the physical capital and of substitutability between labor and capital in the short run using two types of technologies: labor neutral and labor reducing. The author proposed that labor and physical capital inputs are complementary in the short run and can become substitutes only in the long run when the technology advances. Findings The author found that even if the technology improves at a fast rate over time, there are then diminishing returns of profits to technology and an upper limit to profits. Moreover, the author showed that under the labor-reducing technology, labor class earns more initially as technology improves, but their incomes start declining after some threshold level of passage of time. Originality/value The author cautioned the applied researcher that the estimated labor and capital coefficients of generalized Cobb–Douglas and constant elasticity of substitution of types of production functions could not be interpreted as partial elasticities of labor and capital if in reality the data come from fixed-proportions types of processes.