z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Perspectives and limitations of symmetric X‐ray Bragg reflections for inspecting polytypism in nanowires
Author(s) -
Köhl Martin,
Schroth Philipp,
Baumbach Tilo
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of synchrotron radiation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.172
H-Index - 99
ISSN - 1600-5775
DOI - 10.1107/s1600577516000333
Subject(s) - nanowire , diffraction , wurtzite crystal structure , stacking , materials science , crystallography , synchrotron , reflection (computer programming) , electron diffraction , condensed matter physics , optics , nanotechnology , physics , chemistry , computer science , nuclear magnetic resonance , programming language
X‐ray diffraction, possibly time‐resolved during growth or annealing, is an important technique for the investigation of polytypism in free‐standing nanowires. A major advantage of the X‐ray diffraction approach for adequately chosen beam conditions is its high statistical significance in comparison with transmission electron microscopy. In this manuscript the interpretation of such X‐ray intensity distribution is discussed, and is shown to be non‐trivial and non‐unique given measurements of the [111] c or [333] c reflection of polytypic nanowires grown in the (111) c direction. In particular, the diffracted intensity distributions for several statistical distributions of the polytypes inside the nanowires are simulated and compared. As an example, polytypic GaAs nanowires are employed, grown on a Si‐(111) substrate with an interplanar spacing of the Ga (or As) planes in the wurtzite arrangement that is 0.7% larger than in the zinc blende arrangement along the (111) c direction. Most importantly, ambiguities of high experimental relevance in the case of strongly fluctuating length of the defect‐free polytype segments in the nanowires are demonstrated. As a consequence of these ambiguities, a large set of deviations from the widely used Markov model for the stacking sequences of the nanowires cannot be detected in the X‐ray diffraction data. Thus, the results here are of high relevance for the proper interpretation of such data.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here