Premium
Quantitative characterization of the microstructure of heat‐treated Zr‐Excel by neutron line profile analysis
Author(s) -
Ahmmed Kazi F.,
Balogh Levente,
Idrees Yasir,
Yu Hongbing,
Long Fei,
Daymond Mark R.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of applied crystallography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.429
H-Index - 162
ISSN - 1600-5767
DOI - 10.1107/s1600576716011924
Subject(s) - microstructure , materials science , equiaxed crystals , neutron diffraction , ductility (earth science) , dislocation , martensite , crystallography , phase (matter) , alloy , composite material , crystal structure , creep , chemistry , organic chemistry
Neutron diffraction line profile analysis (DLPA) and transmission electron microscopy were used to characterize the components of the bimodal microstructure of Zr‐Excel (Zr–3.5Sn–0.8Mo–0.8Nb), a nuclear structural material. The dual microstructure, consisting of equiaxed primary grains and martensitic domains both having hexagonal close‐packed (h.c.p.) α crystal structure, forms when the as‐received Zr‐Excel alloy is heat treated at a high temperature and subsequently quenched, i.e . is solution treated. Because both microstructure components have the same crystal structure the reflections from the two components overlap significantly. The article presents how the multi‐phase analysis capability of modern DLPA methods can be used to model the measured neutron diffraction patterns as the sum of two sub‐patterns corresponding to the components of such a bimodal microstructure, which can be found in many hexagonal alloys relevant for industrial applications. The results show that the large equiaxed primary h.c.p. α grains have a highly correlated low‐density dislocation structure and large sub‐grains (∼300 nm), while the large martensitic domains have a randomly arranged very high density dislocation structure and sub‐grains the size of ∼30 nm. The significantly different defect structures of the primary and martensitic phases manifest as large differences in the hardness and ductility of the individual components. As a result of this duality of the mechanical properties, solution‐treated Zr‐Excel materials can be considered as analogous to metal matrix composites where a softer ductile matrix contains a harder brittle reinforcing phase.