z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Possible Involvement of Calmodulin and the Cytoskeleton in Electrofusion of Plant Protoplasts
Author(s) -
Shunnosuke Abe,
Jun Takeda
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
plant physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.554
H-Index - 312
eISSN - 1532-2548
pISSN - 0032-0889
DOI - 10.1104/pp.81.4.1151
Subject(s) - calmodulin , electrofusion , trifluoperazine , verapamil , cytochalasin b , channel blocker , egta , hordeum vulgare , cytochalasin , biology , staurosporine , biophysics , microfilament , biochemistry , calcium , chemistry , cytoskeleton , protein kinase c , botany , kinase , cell , materials science , poaceae , organic chemistry , metallurgy , enzyme
Calmodulin antagonists, trifluoperazine, chlorpromazine, calmidazolium, N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-naphthalenesulfonamide (W-7), strongly inhibited the electrofusion of barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv Moor) protoplasts with a marked increase of broken fusion products, after 60 minutes of incubation. W-5, a dechlorinated analog of W-7, was found less effective for the inhibition than W-7. Ethyleneglycol-bis(beta- aminoethylether)-N,N'-tetraacetic acid a Ca(2+) chelator, La(3+), a surface Ca(2+) antagonist, and verapamil, a Ca(2+) channel blocker, also inhibited electrofusion. Dielectrophoresis was inhibited by La(3+). A microtubule inhibitor, vinblastine, inhibited electrofusion strongly while colchicine, slightly. A microfilament inhibitor, cytochalasin B, promoted fused cells to become spherical while phalloidin did not affect electrofusion.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here