z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Dominance in a socially dynamic setting: hierarchical structure and conflict dynamics in ravens' foraging groups
Author(s) -
Palmyre H. Boucherie,
Mario GallegoAbenza,
Jorg J. M. Massen,
Thomas Bugnyar
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
philosophical transactions - royal society. biological sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.753
H-Index - 272
eISSN - 1471-2970
pISSN - 0962-8436
DOI - 10.1098/rstb.2020.0446
Subject(s) - foraging , dominance hierarchy , dominance (genetics) , agonistic behaviour , population , social animal , aggression , biology , ecology , social group , pecking order , psychology , social psychology , demography , sociology , biochemistry , gene
Dominance hierarchies typically emerge in systems where group members regularly encounter and compete for resources. In birds, the ‘open’ and dynamic structure of foraging groups may prevent the emergence of structured hierarchies, although this assumption have hardly been tested. We report on agonistic data for ravensCorvus corax , collected over two 18-month periods for 183 marked individuals of a wild (fluid) population and 51 birds from six captive (stable) groups. We show that the dominance structure (steep and transitive) in wild foraging groups is strikingly similar to that found in captivity. In the wild, we found that higher ranks are mainly occupied by males, older and more aggressive individuals that also tend to receive fewer aggressions. Exploring the mechanisms sustaining the wild dominance structure, we confirmed that males are more aggressive than females and, with age, tend to receive fewer aggressions than females. Males that are about to leave the foraging groups for some months are less aggressive than newcomers or locals, while newcomers are specifically targeted by aggressions in their first year (as juveniles). Taken together, our results indicate that the socially dynamic conditions ravens face during foraging do not hinder, but provide opportunities for, using (advanced) social cognition.This article is part of the theme issue ‘The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies’.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here