
Acceptability of Standardized EEG Reporting in an Electronic Health Record
Author(s) -
Stephanie Witzman,
Shavonne L. Massey,
Sudha Kilaru Kessler,
Ernesto González-Giraldo,
Sara Fridinger,
Lila Worden,
Naomi Lewin,
Dennis Dlugos,
Susan Melamed,
Mark P. Fitzgerald,
France W. Fung,
Marissa Ferruzi,
Nicole McNamee,
Denise LaFalce,
Maureen Donnelly,
Amber Haywood,
Linda Allen-Napoli,
Brenda Banwell,
Nicholas S. Abend
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of clinical neurophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.657
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 1537-1603
pISSN - 0736-0258
DOI - 10.1097/wnp.0000000000000639
Subject(s) - documentation , standardization , workflow , quality (philosophy) , quality management , quality assurance , electronic health record , medical education , medicine , health care , computer science , operations management , management system , database , external quality assessment , engineering , philosophy , epistemology , pathology , economics , programming language , economic growth , operating system
Implementation of electronic health records may improve the quality, accuracy, timeliness, and availability of documentation. Thus, our institution developed a system that integrated EEG ordering, scheduling, standardized reporting, and billing. Given the importance of user perceptions for successful implementation, we performed a quality improvement study to evaluate electroencephalographer satisfaction with the new EEG report system.