Open AccessThe Use of Ancillary Services Under a Bundled Care Versus a Fee-For-Service Payment Model
Author(s) -
Lauren Caldwell,
Gabriela E. Halder,
Stephanie Nutt,
Rebecca G. Rogers,
Michelle L. Wright,
Audrey Baum,
Amanda B. White
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.648
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 2154-4212
pISSN - 2151-8378
DOI - 10.1097/spv.0000000000001071
Subject(s) - medicine , fee for service , payment , service (business) , actuarial science , marketing , finance , health care , business , economic growth , economics
Colocated services in a team-based integrated practice unit (IPU) optimize care of pelvic floor disorders. Our goal was to compare ancillary service utilization in a multidisciplinary IPU between patients covered by a bundled payment model (BPM) versus a traditional fee-for-service model (FFSM).