Open AccessDeciding Our Future: Consensus Conference Summary Report
Author(s) -
Nazema Y. Siddiqui,
Gena C. Dunivan,
Christopher Chermansky,
Catherine S. Bradley
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.648
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 2154-4212
pISSN - 2151-8378
DOI - 10.1097/spv.0000000000000850
Subject(s) - terminology , standardization , medicine , quality (philosophy) , medline , health care , best practice , scale (ratio) , patient reported outcome , patient satisfaction , inclusion (mineral) , work (physics) , quality management , quality of life (healthcare) , nursing , computer science , operations management , psychology , political science , philosophy , law , linguistics , engineering , operating system , social psychology , epistemology , quantum mechanics , mechanical engineering , management system , physics , economics
There are few quality measures that allow for optimization of care for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). In coordination with the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS), a prior group agreed upon health care provider-reported data elements that are important for large-scale quality measurement. The primary objective was to review existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement tools for POP and consider where improvements are needed for inclusion in a quality measurement tool. A secondary objective was to discuss enhanced strategies to improve the quality of care for women with mesh complications.