Open AccessShort-Term Efficacy and Safety of Different Mechanical Hemodynamic Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock or High-Risk Pci: a Network Meta-Analysis of Thirty-Seven Trials
Author(s) -
Jingwei Duan,
Yuanchao Shi,
Gongming Luo,
Yün Peng,
Baomin Duan,
Zheng Zhang
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
shock
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.095
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1540-0514
pISSN - 1073-2322
DOI - 10.1097/shk.0000000000001611
Subject(s) - cardiogenic shock , medicine , conventional pci , percutaneous coronary intervention , cardiology , ventricular assist device , hemodynamics , mortality rate , myocardial infarction , heart failure
With more advanced mechanical hemodynamic support for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) or high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HS-PCI), the morality rate is now significantly lower than before. While previous studies showed that intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) did not reduce the risk of mortality in patients with CS compared to conservative treatment, the efficacy in other mechanical circulatory support (MCS) trials was inconsistent.