z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Polyp Progression in Paediatric Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
Author(s) -
Anele Chukwuemeka C.,
Xiang Jinpo,
Martin Isabel,
Hawkins Menna,
Clark Susan K.,
Faiz Omar D.,
Latchford Andrew,
Hyer Warren
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.206
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1536-4801
pISSN - 0277-2116
DOI - 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002845
Subject(s) - medicine , colonoscopy , familial adenomatous polyposis , colectomy , adenoma , family history , gastroenterology , adenomatous polyposis coli , general surgery , colorectal cancer , surgery , cancer
Objectives: Prophylactic colectomy at a premalignant stage is the cornerstone of management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Before surgery, colonoscopy surveillance is recommended in children with FAP. This study aimed to examine the natural history of FAP in children by evaluating adenoma progression and factors influencing timing of colectomy. Method: Patients with FAP younger than 18 years at first surveillance colonoscopy and who had undergone more than 1 colonoscopy were identified. Demographic, endoscopic, genetic, and surgical data were retrieved. Cumulative adenoma (polyp) counts were obtained while accounting for any polypectomies during the study period. The rate of polyp progression and factors influencing the timing of colectomy were evaluated. Results: Eighty‐four patients (50% boys; mean age at first colonoscopy 13 years [standard deviation 1.97]) were identified, of which 83 had a family history of FAP. At first colonoscopy, 67 (79%) had <100 adenomas and 29 (35%) had colonic polyps identified despite rectal sparing. The median rate of polyp progression per patient was 12.5 polyps/year (range 0–145). Of the 45 (54%) patients who had undergone surgery, 41 (91%) underwent colectomy with ileorectal or ileodistal sigmoid anastomosis. Polyp progression did not alter the choice of surgical intervention in any patient. Conclusion: Our results suggest that adenoma number remains relatively stable in the majority of children under surveillance. Tailored surveillance intervals according to phenotype are a more appropriate strategy as recommended by recently published guidelines.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here