z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Prospective, Randomized Cross‐over Trial of 2 Low‐profile Gastrostomy Buttons to Determine Family Preference
Author(s) -
Abdelhadi Ruba A.,
Dekonenko Charlene,
Dorman Robert M.,
Oyetunji Tolulope A.,
St. Peter Shawn D.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.206
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1536-4801
pISSN - 0277-2116
DOI - 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002585
Subject(s) - medicine , crossover study , randomized controlled trial , tube (container) , gastrostomy tube , gastrostomy , surgery , population , mechanical engineering , alternative medicine , environmental health , pathology , engineering , placebo
Low‐profile gastrostomy balloon buttons are often used in the pediatric population. We conducted a prospective, randomized crossover trial to determine family preference comparing MIC‐KEY (tube A) and MiniONE (tube B) buttons. Patients were randomized to tube A and tube B at placement. At 2 months, patients were given the opposite button. At 4 months, parents indicated their preferred button. A standardized assessment tool was used to assess gastrostomy site skin complications and device malfunction. One hundred fifty‐eight patients were randomized, 79 each to receive tube A or tube B first. Sixty‐eight with tube A and 60 with tube B completed their first follow‐up. Sixty‐five with tube A and 43 with tube B completed crossover, 69% of whom preferred tube B ( P < 0.001). Including those who preferred their first button and declined to switch at 2 months, 91 of 127 (72%) kept tube B, demonstrating a strong preference for tube B.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom