z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Vagus nerve stimulation for upper limb motor impairment after ischemic stroke
Author(s) -
Yulei Xie,
Shan Wang,
Qing Wu,
Xin Chen
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.59
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1536-5964
pISSN - 0025-7974
DOI - 10.1097/md.0000000000027871
Subject(s) - medicine , vagus nerve stimulation , physical medicine and rehabilitation , stroke (engine) , vagus nerve , stimulation , motor impairment , mechanical engineering , engineering
Background: Upper limb motor impairment is a common complication following stroke. Although few treatments are used to enhance motor function, still approximately 60% of survivors are left with upper limb motor impairment. Several studies have investigated vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a potential technique for upper limb function. However, the efficacy and safety of VNS on upper limb motor function after ischemic stroke have not been systematically evaluated. Therefore, a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trial will be conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of VNS on upper limb motor function after ischemic stroke. Method: We searched PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Library (CNKI), and Wan Fang Database until April 1, 2021. Results: Six studies consisting of 234 patients were included in the analysis. Compared with control group, VNS improved upper limb function via Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (mean difference = 3.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.79, 3.74], P  < .00001) and Functional Independence Measurement (mean difference = 6.59, 95%CI [5.77, 7.41], P  < .00001), but showed no significant change on Wolf motor function test (standardized mean difference = 0.31, 95%CI [–0.15, 0.77], P  = .19). The number of adverse events were not significantly different between the studied groups (risk ratio = 1.05, 95%CI [0.85, 1.31], P  = .64). Conclusion: VNS resulted in improvement of motor function in patients after ischemic stroke, especially in the sub-chronic stage. Moreover, compared with implanted VNS, transcutaneous VNS exhibited greater efficacy in poststroke patients. Based on this meta-analysis, VNS could be a feasible and safe therapy for upper limb motor impairment.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here