Open AccessAcute reduction of erector spinae muscle cross-sectional area is associated with ICU-AW and worse prognosis in patients with mechanical ventilation in the ICU
Author(s) -
Gang Yuan,
Jie Zhang,
Zhifang Mou,
Jiye Luo,
Yongpeng Xie
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.59
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1536-5964
pISSN - 0025-7974
DOI - 10.1097/md.0000000000027806
Subject(s) - medicine , mechanical ventilation , intensive care unit , ventilation (architecture) , receiver operating characteristic , intensive care , area under the curve , anesthesia , intensive care medicine , mechanical engineering , engineering
Background: To investigate the values of erector spinae muscle cross-sectional area (ESMcsa) loss for diagnosing intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) and predicting the 60-day survival status in patients with mechanical ventilation. Methods: Patients who were admitted into the intensive care unit (ICU) and received invasive mechanical ventilation therapy from June 2018 to June 2020 were selected. And they were divided into an ICU-AW group and a non-ICU-AW group, which were compared based on the ESMcsa and The British Medical Research Council muscle strength score (MRC-score) on the 1st and 7th day of ICU admission. The receiver operating characteristic curve was employed to measure the values of the ESMcsa Loss and ESMcsa Loss Ratio on the 7th day in order to diagnose ICU-AW in patients with mechanical ventilation. The survival curves of the patients were plotted to analyze the ESMcsa Loss Ratio values for predicting the 60-day survival status. Results: A total of 104 patients were enrolled, they were divided into the ICU-AW group (n = 56) and the non-ICU-AW group (n = 48). The mechanical ventilation time, ICU stay time, and hospital stay time of the ICU-AW group were all significantly higher than those of the non-ICU-AW group. On the 1st day, no significant difference in the ESMcsa or MRC-score between the 2 groups of patients was observed. On the 7th day, the ESMcsa and MRC-score of the ICU-AW group were significantly lower than those of the non-ICU-AW group. The ESMcsa Loss and ESMcsa Loss Ratio were both significantly negatively correlated with the MRC-score. The ESMcsa Loss and ESMcsa Loss Ratio on the 7th day were both valuable for the prediction of ICU-AW in patients with mechanical ventilation (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.904, 0.835, and 0.889, P < .001). The survival rate of the patients in the high- and low-ESMcsa Loss Ratio groups were 60.0% and 80.0% ( P < .05). Conclusions: As suggested by the ESMcsa Loss Ratios of the patients with mechanical ventilation on the 7th day of ICU admission, it offers a desirable objective indicator for the diagnosis of ICU-AW, and provides certain values for predicting the 60-day survival status of patients with mechanical ventilation in the ICU.