Open AccessComparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma
Author(s) -
Ya Liu,
Yunfeng Jin,
Yuemei Lu,
Xiaorong Zhong,
Hong Lu
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.59
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1536-5964
pISSN - 0025-7974
DOI - 10.1097/md.0000000000027148
Subject(s) - medicine , endometrial cancer , laparotomy , cochrane library , stage (stratigraphy) , hysterectomy , laparoscopic surgery , carcinoma , general surgery , incidence (geometry) , laparoscopy , open surgery , surgery , meta analysis , gynecology , cancer , paleontology , physics , biology , optics
Background: Endometrial carcinoma is a prevalent form of cancer. In fact, its incidence ranks fourth among European and North American females. Moreover, it is the most common gynecological malignant disease. Laparotomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, etc were common methods adopted in conventional open surgery. Recent developments in laparoscopic surgery (LPS) has made it more effective. The present study aims to compare the outcomes between LPS and a conventional open surgical procedure to treat stage II endometrial carcinoma patients. Methods: A comprehensive search will be conducted on Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and China National of Knowledge Infrastructure to collect LPS and conventional open surgery in treating stage II endometrial carcinoma. The search will consider all articles published since the inception of the databases till July 2021. A pair of scholars will perform independent screening of the literature and extracted data to evaluate the bias risk in the selected studies. Afterwards, RevMan5.3 software will be used to conduct a meta-analysis. Conclusion: This study will conduct a meta-analysis to compare the clinical efficacy of LPS and conventional open surgery in the treatment of stage II endometrial carcinoma.