Open AccessPlasma rich in growth factors versus Mitomycin C in photorefractive keratectomy
Author(s) -
Ronald Mauricio Sánchez-Ávila,
Edmar Uribe-Badillo,
Julio Jesús Acero Sanz,
Francisco Muruzábal,
Nancy Jurado,
Belén Alfonso-Bartolozzi,
José F. Alfonso,
Begoña Baamonde,
Eduardo Anitua,
Jesús Merayo-Llovés
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.59
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1536-5964
pISSN - 0025-7974
DOI - 10.1097/md.0000000000024139
Subject(s) - medicine , photorefractive keratectomy , mitomycin c , ophthalmology , visual acuity , surgery
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) in photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus Mitomycin C (MMC). This is a comparative, longitudinal and retrospective case-control study (MMC vs PRGF), in patients with a spherical correction from −0.25 to −8.00 D and cylinder correction from −0.25 to −3.00. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), refractive efficacy and safety indices, and changes in endothelial cell density were evaluated. The predictability was assessed with the postoperative manifest spherical equivalent. Forty-four patients (72 eyes) were treated with MMC and twenty-five patients (45 eyes) with PRGF. The final UDVA (LogMar) in MMC was 0.029 ± 0.065 and in PRGF it was 0.028 ± 0.048 (p = 0.383). The efficacy index for MMC was 0.98 ± 0.10 and 1.10 ± 0.46 for patients treated with PRGF (p = 0.062). The safety index for MMC was 1.03 ± 0.11 and 1.12 ± 0.46 (p = 0.158) for PRGF group. The change percentage of endothelial cell density was 0.9 ± 11.6 for MMC and 4.3 ± 13.1 for PRGF (p = 0.593). The predictability for MMC was 92.1% and for the PRGF was 91.9% (p = 0.976). Hyperemia, eye pain and superficial keratitis were observed in 11.1% of the MMC group; no adverse events were observed with the PRGF. The use of PRGF in PRK surgery is as effective as MMC. The PRGF shows a better safety profile than MMC for its intraoperative use in PRK.