z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of 4 sinus augmentation techniques for implant placement with residual alveolar bone height ≤3 mm
Author(s) -
ChiaYing Tsai,
WheiLin Pan,
YuHwa Pan,
ChiuPo Chan,
YuhRen Ju,
Yuan-Min Wang,
ChoYing Lin,
Chi-Ching Chang
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.59
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1536-5964
pISSN - 0025-7974
DOI - 10.1097/md.0000000000023180
Subject(s) - medicine , osteotome , implant , sinus (botany) , maxillary sinus , dentistry , dental alveolus , stage (stratigraphy) , prosthesis , surgery , orthodontics , paleontology , botany , biology , genus
This study compared implant outcomes following maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) in edentulous patients with a residual alveolar bone height ≤3 mm. Four techniques were evaluated: 1-stage bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure (BAOSFE) with simultaneous implant placement; 2-stage BAOSFE with delayed implant placement; 1-stage lateral window sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement; and 2-stage lateral window sinus floor elevation with delayed implant placement. Patients were followed for 18 to 72 months (mean: 52.5 months) after prosthesis placement. Data were analyzed with cone-beam computed tomography. A total of 96 implants from 71 patients were analyzed; pretreatment, there were no significant differences between patients. Total implant survival was 98.9%. The mean residual bone height was significantly higher in the 1-stage BAOSFE group than the other groups ( P  < .01); 1 implant in this group failed at 3 months. There was no significant difference in total bone height gain between groups. However, the bone height gain of 1st sinus lifting with 2-stage BAOSFE was significantly lower than the 2-stage lateral window procedure ( P  < .01). There was no prosthesis failure. The favorable implant outcomes suggest these 1-stage and 2-stage MSFA procedures should be considered as alternative treatment options for patients with extremely atrophic posterior maxilla.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here