Open AccessPET/CT for differentiating between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis
Author(s) -
Shaobo Wang,
Yunhai Ji,
Hubing Wu,
Quanshi Wang,
Wenlan Zhou,
Liang Liu,
Tao Shou,
Jing Hu
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.59
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1536-5964
pISSN - 0025-7974
DOI - 10.1097/md.0000000000005867
Subject(s) - medicine , peritoneum , peritonitis , distribution (mathematics) , lesion , nuclear medicine , fluorodeoxyglucose , pathology , radiology , positron emission tomography , mathematical analysis , mathematics
Objectives: Tuberculous peritonitis (TBP) mimics peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). We aimed to investigate the discriminative use of PET/CT findings in the parietal peritoneum. Materials and Methods: Parietal peritoneal PET/CT findings from 76 patients with TBP (n = 25) and PC (n = 51) were retrospectively reviewed. The lesion locations were noted as right subdiaphragmatic, left subdiaphragmatic, right paracolic gutters, left paracolic gutters, and pelvic regions. The distribution characteristic consisted of a dominant distribution in the pelvic and/or right subdiaphragmatic region (susceptible area for peritoneal implantation, SAPI) (SAPI distribution), a dominant distribution in the remaining regions (less-susceptible area for peritoneal implantation, LSAPI) (LSAPI distribution), or a uniform distribution. PET morphological patterns were classified as F18-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) uptake in a long beaded line (string-of-beads 18 F-FDG uptake) or in a cluster (clustered 18 F-FDG uptake) or focal 18 F-FDG uptake. CT patterns included smooth uniform thickening, irregular thickening, or nodules. Results: More common findings in the parietal peritoneum corresponding to TBP as opposed to PC were (a) ≥4 involved regions (80.0% vs 19.6%), (b) uniform distribution (72.0% vs 5.9%), (c) string-of-beads 18 F-FDG uptake (76.0% vs 7.8%), and (d) smooth uniform thickening (60.0% vs 7.8%) (all P < 0.001), whereas more frequent findings in PC compared with TBP were (a) SAPI distribution (78.4% vs 28.0%), (b) clustered 18 F-FDG uptake (56.9% vs 20.0%), (c) focal 18 F-FDG uptake (21.6% vs 4.0%), (d) irregular thickening (51.0% vs 12.0%), and (e) nodules (21.6% vs 4.0%) ( P < 0.001, P < 0.05, P > 0.05, P < 0.05, P > 0.05, respectively). Conclusion: Our data show that PET/CT findings in the parietal peritoneum are useful for differentiating between TBP and PC.