
Safety comparison of four types of rabies vaccines in patients with WHO category II animal exposure
Author(s) -
Jun Peng,
Sha Lu,
Zhenggang Zhu,
Man Zhang,
Qinxue Hu,
Yuan Fang
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.59
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1536-5964
pISSN - 0025-7974
DOI - 10.1097/md.0000000000005049
Subject(s) - medicine , rabies , adverse effect , rabies vaccine , incidence (geometry) , age groups , group b , pediatrics , virology , rabies virus , demography , physics , sociology , optics
To evaluate the safeties of 4 types of rabies vaccines for patients with WHO category II animal exposure, especially in different age groups. A total of 4000 patients with WHO category II animal exposure were randomly divided into 4 vaccine groups, and were respectively given with Vaccines A, B, C, and D. And subjects in each vaccine group were divided into 4 age groups (≤5, 5–18, 19–60, and ≥60-year-old groups). Then adverse events (including local and systemic ones) were recorded and compared. Consequently, except for Vaccine B, patients under the age of 5 in Groups A, C, and D suffered from more adverse reactions than those in other age groups. Furthermore, for the children aged less than 5 years, incidence of adverse events following administration of Vaccine B, with the dose of 0.5 mL and production of bioreactor systems, was significantly lower than Vaccines A and D. Our data showed that rabies vaccines with smaller doses and more advanced processing techniques are of relatively high safety for the patients, especially for the young children.