z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Diagnostic performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio for the evaluation of coronary stenosis severity confirmed by fractional flow reserve
Author(s) -
Wanrong Man,
Jianqiang Hu,
Zhiling Zhao,
Mingming Zhang,
Tingting Wang,
Jing Lin,
Yu Duan,
Ling Wang,
Haichang Wang,
Sun Dong-dong,
Yan Li
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.59
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1536-5964
pISSN - 0025-7974
DOI - 10.1097/md.0000000000004774
Subject(s) - medicine , receiver operating characteristic , fractional flow reserve , diagnostic odds ratio , likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing , cardiology , area under the curve , odds ratio , stenosis , meta analysis , coronary flow reserve , coronary artery disease , coronary angiography , myocardial infarction
Background: The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is a new vasodilator-free index of coronary stenosis severity. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the diagnostic performance of iFR for the evaluation of coronary stenosis severity with fractional flow reserve as standard reference. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ProQuest, Web of Science, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for publications concerning the diagnostic value of iFR. We used a random-effects covariate to synthesize the available data of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR−), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Overall test performance was summarized by the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) and the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Eight studies with 1611 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR−, and DOR for iFR were respectively 73.3% (70.1–76.2%), 86.4% (84.3–88.3%), 5.71 (4.43–7.37), 0.29 (0.22–0.38), and 20.54 (16.11–26.20). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves for iFR was 0.8786. No publication bias was identified. Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that iFR may be a new, simple, and promising technology for coronary stenosis physiological assessment.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here