z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
It Is Not Mandatory to Use Triple Rather Than Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy After a Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent
Author(s) -
Ju-Youn Kim,
Yoo Seong Choi,
Ahreum Kwon,
WooBaek Chung,
ChulSoo Park,
Hee-Yeol Kim,
Kiyuk Chang,
Man-Young Lee,
Wook-Sung Chung,
KiBae Seung
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.59
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1536-5964
pISSN - 0025-7974
DOI - 10.1097/md.0000000000002062
Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous coronary intervention , drug eluting stent , cardiology , drug , platelet aggregation inhibitor , surgery , platelet , myocardial infarction , pharmacology
It has been shown that triple antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol results in better clinical outcomes than dual therapy in patients treated with a first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES); however, it is unclear whether triple antiplatelet therapy has a similar efficacy after the implantation of second-generation DES. In the COACT (Cath Olic medical center percutAneous Coronary in Tervention) registry, 1248 study subjects who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with an everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor, Xience V, or Promus) were analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups after propensity score matching (n = 724; M = 422 [58.3%]; mean age = 66.1 ± 11.0 years): Group 1: patients treated with dual antiplatelet drugs (aspirin and clopidogrel; n = 362; M = 213 [58.8%]; mean age = 65.6 ± 11.7 years); Group 2: patients treated with triple antiplatelet drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol; n = 362; M = 209 [57.7%]; mean age = 65.6 ± 11.7 years). The mean follow-up duration was 13 ± 10 months, and the cumulative incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE) was 6.3% in Group 1 and 7.7% in Group 2. There were no significant differences in MACE (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke) between the 2 groups (OR, 1.210; 95% CI: 0.772–1.898; P  = 0.406). Kaplan–Meier curves for MACE did not show any survival benefit for triple antiplatelet therapy, even in patients with acute coronary syndrome. In patients treated with a second-generation DES implantation, there is no added clinical benefit to using triple rather than dual antiplatelet therapy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here