z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of clot-based and chromogenic assay for the determination of protein c activity
Author(s) -
Tariq Mahmood Roshan,
Nancy L. Stein,
Xiu Y Jiang
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
blood coagulation and fibrinolysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.376
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1473-5733
pISSN - 0957-5235
DOI - 10.1097/mbc.0000000000000806
Subject(s) - chromogenic , partial thromboplastin time , protein c , coagulation , medicine , bradford protein assay , chemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , chromatography , biology
: Activated protein C inactivates factor Va and VIIIa. Deficiency of this natural anticoagulant may result in recurrent venous thrombosis. Performance characteristics of clot-based and chromogenic protein C activity assays are different. The clot-based assay has limitations because of interference with coagulation inhibitors resulting in spuriously increased protein C levels or underestimation because of elevated levels of factor VIII and Factor V-Leiden mutation. The chromogenic assay is not influenced by such interferences but only detects functional defects of protein C that involve the active site rendering it insensitive to rare mutations. To compare two methods, we conducted a retrospective study from January 2015 to June 2017. Our results showed a good correlation between clot-based and chromogenic assay (R = 0.94 and r = 0.88). The study of agreement between the two methods by the Bland-Altman method showed that chromogenic method on an average measures 7.8% more protein C than that of clot-based. The results also showed that the bias between the two methods is significant. The positive trend noted was contributed by the values of less than 20% of protein C. Both clot-based and chromogenic assays had high sensitivity; however, the chromogenic assay showed better specificity (97%) as compared with the clot-based assay (93%). In conclusion, we recommend the chromogenic method as the assay of choice, which is also recommended by the College of American Pathologist Consensus Study over activated partial thromboplastin time-based assay. We have shown here that despite a good correlation between the two techniques, there is a difference as highlighted by the difference plots.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here