What Predicts Intention-Behavior Discordance? A Review of the Action Control Framework | Zendy

Ryan E. Rhodes | Zendy; GertJan de Bruijn | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

What Predicts Intention-Behavior Discordance? A Review of the Action Control Framework

Author(s) -

Ryan E. Rhodes,

GertJan de Bruijn

Publication year - 2013

Publication title -

exercise and sport sciences reviews

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.945

H-Index - 99

eISSN - 1538-3008

pISSN - 0091-6331

DOI - 10.1097/jes.0b013e3182a4e6ed

Subject(s) - automaticity , psychology , action (physics) , theory of planned behavior , perceived control , control (management) , regulatory focus theory , social psychology , cognitive psychology , cognition , neuroscience , computer science , physics , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , creativity

The physical activity intention-behavior gap is a focus of considerable research. The purpose of this article is to overview contemporary evidence for predictors of this intention-behavior discordance using the action control framework developed in our laboratories. We propose the hypothesis that intention-behavior discordance is from motivational (affective attitude, perceived behavioral control), self-regulatory (behavioral processes), and habitual (automaticity) constructs.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research