
Do Author Conflicts of Interest and Industry Sponsorship Influence Outcomes of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Regarding Glaucoma Interventions? A Cross-sectional Analysis
Author(s) -
Audrey Wise,
Deepika Mannem,
Jon Anderson,
Michael Weaver,
Micah Hartwell,
Matt Vassar
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of glaucoma
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.11
H-Index - 88
eISSN - 1536-481X
pISSN - 1057-0829
DOI - 10.1097/ijg.0000000000001798
Subject(s) - systematic review , medicine , psychological intervention , conflict of interest , meta analysis , family medicine , medline , interest group , glaucoma , ophthalmology , psychiatry , pathology , political science , law , politics
In our sample of systematic reviews focusing on treatments for glaucoma, reviews conducted by authors with a conflict of interest were more likely to reach favorable conclusions compared with reviews without conflicted authors.