z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Do Author Conflicts of Interest and Industry Sponsorship Influence Outcomes of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Regarding Glaucoma Interventions? A Cross-sectional Analysis
Author(s) -
Audrey Wise,
Deepika Mannem,
Jon Anderson,
Michael Weaver,
Micah Hartwell,
Matt Vassar
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of glaucoma
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.11
H-Index - 88
eISSN - 1536-481X
pISSN - 1057-0829
DOI - 10.1097/ijg.0000000000001798
Subject(s) - systematic review , medicine , psychological intervention , conflict of interest , meta analysis , family medicine , medline , interest group , glaucoma , ophthalmology , psychiatry , pathology , political science , law , politics
In our sample of systematic reviews focusing on treatments for glaucoma, reviews conducted by authors with a conflict of interest were more likely to reach favorable conclusions compared with reviews without conflicted authors.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here