
Comparison of 3 Luting Agents on Retention of Implant-Supported Crowns on 2 Different Abutments
Author(s) -
M. Bariş Güncü,
Umut Çakan,
Şenay Canay
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
implant dentistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.538
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1538-2982
pISSN - 1056-6163
DOI - 10.1097/id.0b013e318225f68e
Subject(s) - abutment , cementation (geology) , materials science , dental abutments , implant , zinc phosphate , dentistry , luting agent , ultimate tensile strength , zinc oxide eugenol , orthodontics , composite material , medicine , cement , root canal , adhesive , layer (electronics) , bond strength , engineering , structural engineering , surgery , coating
For fixed prostheses, retention is one of the most important factors for clinical success. It is unknown whether grooves that increase surface area of implant abutment while retaining the diameter and wall height provide greater uniaxial retention force. The purpose of this study was to determine the retention of 3 different cements on 2 implant abutments with different surface configurations.