Open AccessDo Dual-mobility Cups Reduce Revision Risk in Femoral Neck Fractures Compared With Conventional THA Designs? An International Meta-analysis of Arthroplasty Registries
Author(s) -
John Farey,
James G. Masters,
Alana R. Cuthbert,
Pernille Iversen,
Liza N. van Steenbergen,
Heather A. Prentice,
Sam Adie,
Adrian Sayers,
Michael R Whitehouse,
Elizabeth W. Paxton,
Matthew L. Costa,
Søren Overgaard,
Cecilia Rogmark,
Ola Rolfson,
Ian A. Harris
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
clinical orthopaedics and related research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.178
H-Index - 204
eISSN - 1528-1132
pISSN - 0009-921X
DOI - 10.1097/corr.0000000000002275
Subject(s) - medicine , femoral neck , arthroplasty , total hip arthroplasty , meta analysis , hip arthroplasty , sports medicine , surgery , dual (grammatical number) , prosthesis design , prosthesis , physical therapy , osteoporosis , art , literature
Dual-mobility cups in THA were designed to reduce prosthesis instability and the subsequent risk of revision surgery in high-risk patients, such as those with hip fractures. However, there are limited data from clinical studies reporting a revision benefit of dual-mobility over conventional THA. Collaboration between anthroplasty registries provides an opportunity to describe international practice variation and compare between-country, all-cause revision rates for dual-mobility and conventional THA.