z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Mapping and Crosswalk of the Oxford Hip Score and Different Versions of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Author(s) -
Sophie Putman,
Cristian Preda,
Julien Girard,
Alain Duhamel,
Henri Migaud
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
clinical orthopaedics and related research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.178
H-Index - 204
eISSN - 1528-1132
pISSN - 0009-921X
DOI - 10.1097/corr.0000000000001675
Subject(s) - medicine , osteoarthritis , schema crosswalk , physical therapy , avascular necrosis , quality of life (healthcare) , harris hip score , patient reported outcome , orthopedic surgery , rehabilitation , physical medicine and rehabilitation , femoral head , arthroplasty , surgery , alternative medicine , pedestrian , nursing , pathology , transport engineering , engineering
Patient-reported outcome measures such as the Oxford-12 Hip Score and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) are used in daily orthopaedic practice to evaluate patients. Because different studies use different scores, it would be important to build conversion tables between scores (crosswalk) to compare the results of one study with those of another study. Various mapping methods can be used to develop crosswalk tables that convert Oxford-12 scores to the HOOS (and its derivatives, including the HOOS physical function short form, HOOS joint replacement, and HOOS-12) and vice versa. Although prior studies have investigated this issue, they are limited to short forms of the HOOS score. Consequently, they cannot be applied to hip preservation surgery and do not include quality-of-life items, whereas the Oxford-12 Hip Score is used for all hip evaluations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here