z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
What Is the Effect of Using a Competing-risks Estimator when Predicting Survivorship After Joint Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Approaches to Survivorship Estimation in a Large Registry
Author(s) -
Alana R. Cuthbert,
Stephen E. Graves,
Lynne Giles,
Gary Glonek,
Nicole Pratt
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
clinical orthopaedics and related research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.178
H-Index - 204
eISSN - 1528-1132
pISSN - 0009-921X
DOI - 10.1097/corr.0000000000001533
Subject(s) - survivorship curve , medicine , arthroplasty , joint arthroplasty , estimation , sports medicine , estimator , orthopedic surgery , joint (building) , statistics , physical therapy , surgery , cancer , mathematics , economics , architectural engineering , engineering , management
There is increasing interest in the development of statistical models that can be used to estimate risk of adverse patient outcomes after joint arthroplasty. Competing risk approaches have been recommended to estimate risk of longer-term revision, which is often likely to be precluded by the competing risk of death. However, a common approach is to ignore the competing risk by treating death as a censoring event and using standard survival models such as Cox regression. It is well-known that this approach can overestimate the event risk for population-level estimates, but the impact on the estimation of a patient's individualized risk after joint arthroplasty has not been explored.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here