
Are There Differences in Accuracy or Outcomes Scores Among Navigated, Robotic, Patient-specific Instruments or Standard Cutting Guides in TKA? A Network Meta-analysis
Author(s) -
PierreAlban Bouché,
Simon Corsia,
Agnès Dechartres,
Matthieu RescheRigon,
Rémy Nizard
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
clinical orthopaedics and related research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1528-1132
pISSN - 0009-921X
DOI - 10.1097/corr.0000000000001324
Subject(s) - medicine , randomized controlled trial , meta analysis , sagittal plane , womac , physical therapy , physical medicine and rehabilitation , surgery , osteoarthritis , alternative medicine , pathology , radiology
Several kinds of cutting guides, including patient-specific instrumentation, navigation, standard cutting guides, accelerometer-based navigation, and robotic guidance, are available to restore a planned alignment during TKA. No previous study has simultaneously compared all of these devices; a network meta-analysis is an especially appealing method because it allows comparisons across approaches that were not compared head-to-head in individual randomized controlled trials.