z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Are There Differences in Accuracy or Outcomes Scores Among Navigated, Robotic, Patient-specific Instruments or Standard Cutting Guides in TKA? A Network Meta-analysis
Author(s) -
PierreAlban Bouché,
Simon Corsia,
Agnès Dechartres,
Matthieu RescheRigon,
Rémy Nizard
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
clinical orthopaedics and related research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1528-1132
pISSN - 0009-921X
DOI - 10.1097/corr.0000000000001324
Subject(s) - medicine , randomized controlled trial , meta analysis , sagittal plane , womac , physical therapy , physical medicine and rehabilitation , surgery , osteoarthritis , alternative medicine , pathology , radiology
Several kinds of cutting guides, including patient-specific instrumentation, navigation, standard cutting guides, accelerometer-based navigation, and robotic guidance, are available to restore a planned alignment during TKA. No previous study has simultaneously compared all of these devices; a network meta-analysis is an especially appealing method because it allows comparisons across approaches that were not compared head-to-head in individual randomized controlled trials.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here