z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Growth of Poorly Cited Articles in Peer-Reviewed Orthopaedic Journals
Author(s) -
Joost T P Kortlever,
Thi Thu Huong Tran,
David Ring,
Mariano E. Menendez
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
clinical orthopaedics and related research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.178
H-Index - 204
eISSN - 1528-1132
pISSN - 0009-921X
DOI - 10.1097/corr.0000000000000727
Subject(s) - medicine , citation , scopus , publishing , impact factor , medline , library science , computer science , political science , law
In general, journals can be divided in three categories: subscription-model, open-access, and hybrid (that is, open-access by choice). One measure of an article's impact is the number of citations it receives after publication. Open-access publishing may make articles more widely available because there is no financial barrier to a reader seeing the full-text version. As a result, we wondered whether articles published in fully open-access journals would be more likely to be cited than articles in other kinds of journals.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here