Open AccessSurgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy
Author(s) -
Lei Li,
Shuiqing Ma,
Xin Tan,
Sen Zhong,
Ming Wu
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
american journal of clinical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.896
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1537-453X
pISSN - 0277-3732
DOI - 10.1097/coc.0000000000000593
Subject(s) - medicine , radical hysterectomy , nerve sparing , hysterectomy , surgery , urinary system , retrospective cohort study , urology , prostatectomy , prostate cancer , cancer , cervical cancer
The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the surgical, urinary, and survival outcomes between nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) and traditional radical hysterectomy (TRH) for stage IB cervical cancer, in which all the primary procedures were performed by a single physician.