z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Managing the Endosteal Fibula During Arthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fracture Sequelae
Author(s) -
Michael H. Amini
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic trauma
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1531-2291
pISSN - 0890-5339
DOI - 10.1097/bot.0000000000001532
Subject(s) - medicine , intramedullary rod , fibula , fixation (population genetics) , humerus , arthroplasty , humeral fracture , surgery , tibia , population , environmental health
Augmentation of proximal humeral fracture fixation with an endosteal fibular allograft has increased in popularity because it biomechanically improves construct stability and potentially may lead to a lower rate of humeral head collapse. However, the potential need for arthroplasty after proximal humeral fracture fixation may still arise. Placing a humeral stem in the presence of an existing intramedullary fibular graft is challenging because the fibula is dense cortical bone and is typically well-integrated by the time an arthroplasty would be performed. Some have proposed burring the proximal humerus open to receive a stem, or using cannulated intramedullary reamers until a humeral stem can be placed. These steps are tedious and inefficient. We have found the most efficient technique as treating the fibula as if it were a well-fixed humeral stem: freeing it up from the native bone and removing it in its entirety.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here