
Managing the Endosteal Fibula During Arthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fracture Sequelae
Author(s) -
Michael H. Amini
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic trauma
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1531-2291
pISSN - 0890-5339
DOI - 10.1097/bot.0000000000001532
Subject(s) - medicine , intramedullary rod , fibula , fixation (population genetics) , humerus , arthroplasty , humeral fracture , surgery , tibia , population , environmental health
Augmentation of proximal humeral fracture fixation with an endosteal fibular allograft has increased in popularity because it biomechanically improves construct stability and potentially may lead to a lower rate of humeral head collapse. However, the potential need for arthroplasty after proximal humeral fracture fixation may still arise. Placing a humeral stem in the presence of an existing intramedullary fibular graft is challenging because the fibula is dense cortical bone and is typically well-integrated by the time an arthroplasty would be performed. Some have proposed burring the proximal humerus open to receive a stem, or using cannulated intramedullary reamers until a humeral stem can be placed. These steps are tedious and inefficient. We have found the most efficient technique as treating the fibula as if it were a well-fixed humeral stem: freeing it up from the native bone and removing it in its entirety.