
Recognition of Accented Speech by Cochlear-Implant Listeners: Benefit of Audiovisual Cues
Author(s) -
Emily Waddington,
Brittany N. Jaekel,
Anna R. Tinnemore,
Sandra GordonSalant,
Matthew J. Goupell
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
ear and hearing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.577
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1538-4667
pISSN - 0196-0202
DOI - 10.1097/aud.0000000000000842
Subject(s) - cochlear implant , audiology , psychology , speech perception , sensory cue , speech recognition , perception , cognitive psychology , computer science , medicine , neuroscience
When auditory and visual speech information are presented together, listeners obtain an audiovisual (AV) benefit or a speech understanding improvement compared with auditory-only (AO) or visual-only (VO) presentations. Cochlear-implant (CI) listeners, who receive degraded speech input and therefore understand speech using primarily temporal information, seem to readily use visual cues and can achieve a larger AV benefit than normal-hearing (NH) listeners. It is unclear, however, if the AV benefit remains relatively large for CI listeners when trying to understand foreign-accented speech when compared with unaccented speech. Accented speech can introduce changes to temporal auditory cues and visual cues, which could decrease the usefulness of AV information. Furthermore, we sought to determine if the AV benefit was relatively larger in CI compared with NH listeners for both unaccented and accented speech.