z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 446: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Prenatal Diagnosis
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
obstetrics and gynecology (new york. 1953. online)/obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.664
H-Index - 220
eISSN - 1873-233X
pISSN - 0029-7844
DOI - 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181c33cad
Subject(s) - medicine , comparative genomic hybridization , prenatal diagnosis , family medicine , obstetrics , gynecology , pregnancy , genetics , genome , gene , fetus , biology
The widespread use of array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)for the diagnosis of genomic rearrangements in children with idiopathic mental retardation,developmental delay, and multiple congenital anomalies has spurred interest in applying array CGH technology to prenatal diagnosis. The use of array CGH technology in prenatal diagnosis is currently limited by several factors, including the inability to detect balanced chromosomal rearrangements, the detection of copy number variations of uncertain clinical significance, and significantly higher costs than conventional karyotype analysis. Although array CGH has distinct advantages over classic cytogenetics in certain applications, the technology is not currently a replacement for classic cytogenetics in prenatal diagnosis.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here