z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
CE: Assessing Movement-Evoked Pain
Author(s) -
Staja Q. Booker,
Paul Arnstein,
Rianne van Boekel
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
˜the œamerican journal of nursing/american journal of nursing
Language(s) - Uncategorized
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1538-7488
pISSN - 0002-936X
DOI - 10.1097/01.naj.0000822656.14887.1f
Subject(s) - movement (music) , physical medicine and rehabilitation , psychology , medicine , neuroscience , physics , acoustics
One of the most common and nuanced tasks that nurses perform is pain assessment, particularly in acute postoperative settings where frequent reassessments are needed. Most assessments are limited to obtaining a pain intensity score with little attention paid to the conditions necessitating the assessment or the factors contributing to the pain. Pain is frequently assessed during rest, but seldom during periods of movement or activity, which is a crucial omission given that acute postoperative movement-evoked pain (MEP) is intense and a common barrier to healing and restoration of function. In addition to physical limitations, MEP can impede cognitive, emotional, and social functioning in ways that can contribute to chronic pain, mood disorders, and disability. Professional and regulatory standards are moving away from a focus on pain intensity to an emphasis on its context, impact on function, and associated distress. Thus, there are many driving forces compelling nurses to integrate MEP assessments into practice to expedite the restoration of biopsychosocial functioning in postoperative patients. The authors discuss the clinical significance of a MEP assessment as well as protocols and tools for completing such assessments.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here