Premium
Use, Accuracy, and Implications for Patient Management of [18F]‐2‐Fluorodeoxyglucose‐Positron Emission/Computerized Tomography for Head and Neck Tumors
Author(s) -
Zanation Adam M.,
Sutton David K.,
Couch Marion E.,
Weissler Mark C.,
Shockley William W.,
Shores Carol G.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1097/01.mlg.0000163763.89647.9f
Subject(s) - medicine , positron emission tomography , radiology , nuclear medicine , retrospective cohort study , pet ct , head and neck cancer , medical diagnosis , computed tomography , radiation therapy
Objectives/Hypothesis: Positron emission tomography (PET) has shown promise for early detection and accurate staging of cancer patients. A limited number of studies suggest PET/computed tomography (CT) may improve these variables; however, no published study has specifically evaluated clinical outcomes with PET/CT for head and neck (HN) tumors. The current study evaluates the use, accuracy, and implications for patient management of PET/CT scans in patients with HN tumors. Study Design: Retrospective cohort outcomes study at a tertiary care center. Methods: The authors identified 795 consecutive PET/CT at our institution. A total of 113 were obtained for HN tumors; 97 were used in the final analysis. Accuracy, use, and implications for patient care management decisions were correlated with each PET/CT scan. Multiple regression analysis was performed. Results: Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were measured by comparing the PET/CT results at the primary tumor site, cervical node sites, and distant sites with either pathologic or definitive clinical diagnoses. PET/CT had an overall per scan accuracy of 72% and a per patient accuracy of 69%. When stratification for rationale of obtaining the scan was performed, accuracy was 80% for staging distant disease, 67% for primary tumor evaluation, 72% for evaluation for recurrence, and 60% for unknown primary tumor evaluation. Conclusions: PET/CT imaging is a promising tool for evaluating HN tumors; however, in clinical practice, the proper use of such technology is not well studied. In our study, PET/CT had an overall accuracy of 72% in evaluating HN tumors, and PET/CT had the most accuracy in the detection of distant metastasis.