z-logo
Premium
Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Stapes Prostheses
Author(s) -
Syms Mark James
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1097/01.mlg.0000157853.09025.49
Subject(s) - stapes , magnetic resonance imaging , medicine , prosthesis , adverse effect , implant , radiology , prosthesis implantation , middle ear , surgery
Objective: Assess the safety of performing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on patients with stapes prostheses. Study Design: Survey and animal model. Methods: A survey regarding implant usage, MRI procedures, and adverse outcomes after MRI in patients previously undergoing stapes procedures. Guinea pigs implanted with ferromagnetic 17 to 4 stainless steel, 316L nonferromagnetic stainless steel, titanium, and fluoroplastic stapes prostheses underwent a MRI in a 4.7 Tesla MR system. Results: Three adverse outcomes were reported on the clinical survey. One adverse event occurred during an MRI performed on a recalled ferromagnetic prosthesis. The other two adverse events were probably not secondary to MRI exposure. No damage or inflammation was observed in the region of the oval window or vestibule of implanted guinea pigs exposed to a 4.7 Tesla MR system. Conclusions: The combination of prior studies, the clinical survey, and the absence of histopathologic evidence of damage in the guinea pigs is compelling evidence that MRI for patients with stapes prostheses is safe. Implanting physicians should feel comfortable clearing a patient for a MRI in a 1.5 Tesla or 3.0 Tesla MRI. It is imperative for the physician to qualify the field strength when clearing a patient to undergo a MRI.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here