Premium
Acoustic Neuromas after Failed Radiation Therapy: Challenges of Surgical Salvage
Author(s) -
Limb Charles J.,
Long Donlin M.,
Niparko John K.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1097/01.mlg.0000150686.93011.49
Subject(s) - medicine , facial nerve , surgery , acoustic neuroma , cerebellopontine angle , radiation therapy , neuroma , translabyrinthine approach , auditory canal , dissection (medical) , radiology , magnetic resonance imaging
Objectives: As stereotactic radiation has emerged as a treatment option for acoustic neuromas, cases that require surgical salvage after unsuccessful radiation have emerged. We present a comparison of the technical challenges faced by the surgeons in the treatment of irradiated versus nonirradiated acoustic neuromas. Study Design: Matched case‐control series. Methods: We identified nine patients with acoustic neuromas that required surgical resection after radiation therapy. Cases were performed with suboccipital and translabyrinthine approaches. Nine nonirradiated case‐control subjects matched for age, sex, tumor size, and surgical approach were identified for purposes of general comparison. Operative findings and outcomes were compared for the two groups. Results: Surgical removal was found to be significantly more difficult after radiation therapy because of increased fibrosis and adhesion to adjacent nervous structures, particularly at the porus acousticus. Excessive scarring hindered identification of the facial nerve and added uncertainty as to the completeness of tumor removal. Decompression of the internal auditory canal (IAC) dura and resection of neoplasm in the IAC before cerebellopontine angle dissection was required for facial nerve identification. Operative time was significantly longer for irradiated cases, and facial nerve outcomes tended to be poorer, particularly when facial nerve dysfunction prompted the salvage procedure. Conclusions: Surgical salvage of acoustic neuromas after radiation therapy is feasible, but it presents technical challenges beyond that associated with primary surgical therapy. Poorer outcomes of postoperative cranial nerve status were caused primarily by anatomic changes at the nerve/tumor interface. As surgical experience with the irradiated acoustic neuroma grows, operative observations should be incorporated into the counsel provided to patients with acoustic neuromas as they weigh different management options.