z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
PF623 PHASE 1/2 STUDY OF ISATUXIMAB MONOTHERAPY FOR RELAPSED AND/OR REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA IN JAPANESE PATIENTS
Author(s) -
Iida S.,
Sunami K.,
Ri M.,
Matsumoto M.,
Shimazaki C.,
Asaoku H.,
Shibayama H.,
Ishizawa K.,
Takamatsu H.,
Ikeda T.,
Maruyama D.,
Kaneko H.,
Uchiyama M.,
Kiguchi T.,
Iyama S.,
Murakami H.,
Sasaki T.,
Tada K.,
Suzuki K.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
hemasphere
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 11
ISSN - 2572-9241
DOI - 10.1097/01.hs9.0000560780.40516.f9
Subject(s) - tolerability , medicine , oncology , monoclonal antibody , cd38 , multiple myeloma , antibody , pharmacology , immunology , adverse effect , biology , cd34 , stem cell , genetics
Background: CD38 is highly and uniformly expressed on multiple myeloma (MM) cells and is a cell surface receptor target for antibody‐based therapeutics in MM and other malignancies. Isatuximab (ISA) is an anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibody that targets a specific epitope on CD38, and demonstrates significant direct inhibition of CD38 ectoenzyme activity in MM and other hematologic cancer cell lines. Isatuximab acts through a number of IgG Fc‐dependent mechanisms including antibody‐dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement‐dependent cytotoxicity, antibody‐dependent cellular phagocytosis, and direct apoptosiss. In this Phase 1/2 study, we tested tolerability/safety and efficacy of ISA monotherapy in Japanese patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) pretreated with at least 3 prior lines. Aims: In Phase 1: To evaluate safety and tolerability of ISA. In Phase 2: To evaluate efficacy of ISA at recommended dose, and to further evaluate the overall response rate (ORR; ≥Partial Response [PR]) of ISA. Methods: This study was an open‐label, non‐randomized, single arm and multi‐center study in pts with RRMM. Phase 1 was designed as a dose‐escalation study to evaluate the safety, PK, and efficacy of ISA. Pts were sequentially assigned to two dose levels using the 3+3 standard design. Cohort 1 (10 mg/kg every week [QW] in Cycle 1 [4 weeks] followed by 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks [Q2W] in subsequent cycles) and Cohort 2 (20 mg/kg QW in Cycle 1 [4 weeks] followed by 20 mg/kg Q2W in subsequent cycles).. Decisions to escalate the dose were based on the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed during Cycle 1. Phase 2 was designed as a single arm study and commenced after completion of the DLT observation period of the last pt treated in Cohort 2 and determination of the recommended dose to be used in Phase 2. Results: In Phase 1, ISA was administered to 3 and 5 pts at 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg, respectively, and no DLT was observed in both cohorts. The recommended dose for phase 2 was determined as 20 mg/kg. The overall safety profile was consistent with the current knowledge of ISA. The ORRs were 66.7% (2/3 pts) and 60.0% (3/5 pts) in 10 mg and 20 mg cohorts, respectively. In Phase 2, the ORR was 32.1% (9/28 pts). In addition, six pts (21.4%) had the benefit of a minimal response (MR), 5 pts (17.9%) with a PR and 3 pts (10.7%) with a very good PR (VGPR). One pt (3.6%) achieved a complete response (CR). The ORR and clinical benefit rate (CBR; ≥MR) at the recommended dose of 20 mg/kg QW/Q2W in all treatment population (Phase 1 [N = 5] and Phase 2 [N = 28]) were 36.4% (12/33 pts) and 54.5% (18/33 pts), respectively. The null hypothesis (the true response rate <10%) was tested using a one‐sided exact binominal test with a significance level of 0.025 and the result was statistically significant ( P  < 0.0001). In Phase 2, the median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.7 (3.75‐NC; 95%CI) months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached at the cut‐off (approximately 4 months after the last patient in); median and duration of follow‐up was 19.2 (3.6 to 44.6) weeks. The most common ISA‐related adverse events in the all treatment population were infusion reactions (41.7%; 15/36 pts), all of which were grade 1/2 and predominantly occurred during the first infusion. Summary/Conclusion: ISA monotherapy is well tolerated and effective in heavily pretreated Japanese patients with RRMM.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here